Use of a synthetic biodegradable temporising matrix after necrotising fasciitis infection of the thigh
- 1 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
- 2 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
- Correspondence to Dr Daniah ALNafisee; dnafisee@gmail.com
Abstract
Biodegradable temporising matrix (BTM NovoSorb; PolyNovo, Melbourne, Australia) is a novel synthetic polyurethane dermal substitute. Licensed in Europe in 2020, it was developed primarily for reconstruction of infected wounds. We present a case of a healthy man in his 60s with necrotising fasciitis of his left thigh. His medical history was significant for recurrent left thigh liposarcoma that was treated years earlier with surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy. The affected area was within the previously irradiated tissue, debrided down to fascia and dressed with a vacuum-assisted closure to help regenerate the wound bed. Reconstruction options were limited by having a circumferential thigh defect that was infected. Following the use of NovoSorb BTM, the area was dressed with Acticoat Flex 7 antimicrobial barrier dressing for 5 weeks. Patient mobilisation was permitted. The material integrated very well and formed a soft, pliable healthy dermal layer that was autografted with split thickness skin grafts. This resulted in durable cover of the thigh with good aesthetic contour and minimal contracture.
Background
Biodegradable temporising matrix (BTM NovoSorb; PolyNovo, Melbourne, Australia) is a novel completely synthetic dermal substitute.1 It is designed using NovoSorb biodegradable polyurethane foam.1 Licensed in Europe in 2020, this matrix was primarily developed for reconstruction of traumatic and infected wounds.1 Similar to Integra (Integra LifeSciences, Plainsboro, New Jersey, USA), BTM is considered an active temporiser that contributes to wound bed tissue ingrowth and a ‘neodermis’ that will sustain subsequent wound closure.2 However, the use of Integra has been limited as its biological composition makes it prone to infection and loss.2
BTM is composed of NovoSorb matrix sheet, a 2 mm thick bioabsorbable open cell matrix that allows cellular seeding (fibroblasts initially, followed by keratinocytes) to aid in reconstruction of the dermal layer.1–3 This matrix is bonded to a non-biodegradable sealing membrane that limits moisture loss and acts as a barrier to infection.1–3 The procedure is a two-stage reconstruction that involves inset of the material into the defect to allow for host integration and neodermis generation, followed by delamination of the superficial membrane and application of a split thickness skin graft (STSG) approximately 5 weeks later.3
Initially used in human trials to reconstruct free flap donor sites and in pressure sore management, several case reports have shown that it aids in the closure of complex defects such as bare tendon, acute burn injury and large complex wounds following necrotising fasciitis.2–10 BTM was offered as a potential solution to reconstruct the thigh of this relatively healthy man in his 60s with a large circumferential defect that he sustained postdebridement for necrotising fasciitis. A STSG alone has a high risk of failure because of the infected wound bed and absence of a vascularised dermal layer.
Case presentation
A relatively healthy man in his 60s was transferred to a tertiary trauma hospital postdebridement of necrotising fasciitis of his left thigh. Initially, he presented to the general practitioner with multiple purulent discharging sinuses on his left anterior, medial and posterior thigh. His medical history was significant for liposarcoma of the adductor compartment of the left thigh 16 years earlier that was treated by radical surgery. This involved an incision that extended from the groin to the knee. He later developed a number of recurrences that were managed by surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. As a result, the quality of skin on his thigh was grossly abnormal.
The thigh was debrided circumferentially down to fascia exposing the quadriceps anteriorly and the hamstrings posteriorly into the popliteal fossa without exposing the neurovascular bundle. Despite a preoperative CT scan showing air and swelling within muscle, the muscle was essentially healthy and therefore preserved. A vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) dressing was applied to help regenerate the wound bed.
On physical examination, the patient had left foot drop and left lower limb lymphoedema dating back to his original treatment, and he used compression stockings and a foot brace. Otherwise, he had normal lower limb function and mobilised without walking aids at baseline.
Investigations
Preoperative urine and bloods tests were normal. The wound appeared to be colonised with Pseudomonas aeruginosa when the VAC dressing was removed and confirmed on wound culture.
Treatment
His wound was further debrided under general anaesthesia, and BTM was applied to close the defect (figure 1). The BTM was secured with staples and dressed with Acticoat Flex 7 silver-coated antimicrobial barrier dressing (Smith & Nephew, London, UK) (figure 2). The Acticoat Flex 7 fulfilled the recommended guidelines for outer dressings as it has both non-adherent and antimicrobial properties.1 Once he was able to weight bear, he was discharged. On postoperatively day 4, he developed left lower limb cellulitis despite being on oral antibiotics as his compression dressing was not tightly applied prior to discharge. The left thigh was free of infection, and he was admitted for 3 days intravenous antibiotics. Subsequently, he continued to attend the outpatient clinic on a weekly basis for dressing change and to monitor integration of the BTM (figure 3).
After debridement of the left thigh, the patient was left with a large circumferential defect with loss of full-thickness soft tissue over the quadriceps anteriorly and the hamstrings posteriorly into the popliteal fossa without exposing the neurovascular bundle.
Patient’s left thigh with NovoSorb biodegradable temporising matrix in situ intraoperatively day 0.
Patient’s left thigh with NovoSorb biodegradable temporising matrix (BTM) in situ day 4 showing early signs of integration. The BTM becoming more hyperaemic and vascularised with slight slough tissue superiorly.
For the first 2 weeks, we expect the BTM to be visible through the clear sealing membrane, gradually forming a dark red colour due to ingress of blood from the wound.1 By the end of week 2, the colour of the BTM changes from a dark red to a light red.1 From weeks 3 to 6, the pattern and microstructure of the BTM will no longer be visible, which is a sign of further integration, and capillary refill is expected when applying digital pressure to the sealing membrane.1 Around the sixth week, the colour starts to become a uniform pink colour that blanches on digital pressure, making it ready for delamination.1
Potential complications to look out for during the weekly dressing changes are infection that should be treated with antibiotics and excess turbid fluid or haematoma beneath the sealing membrane that might interfere with the integration process and adherence of the BTM to the wound.1 If a collection of fluid cannot be expressed through the existing fenestrations in the BTM membrane, then new fenestrations can be made with a scalpel.1 7 Following that, it is advised to wash the BTM seal with either saline or an antimicrobial brush but to avoid soaking it as too much liquid can wash away cells that are integrating.1 7
On day 42, he returned to the operating theatre for delamination of the BTM (figure 4) and definitive closure of the wound with fenestrated STSGs (figure 5). A small region in the posterior superior area of the thigh and the popliteal fossa were not grafted and left to heal by secondary intention. He was on strict bed rest and was given 7 days of dual antibiotics (augmentin and ciprofloxacin). Seven days later, graft review showed more than 80% take of the STSGs (figure 6). The donor site (right thigh) was slow to heal but improved with a protein-rich diet and supplements (figure 7).
Patient’s left thigh with NovoSorb biodegradable temporising matrix in situ day 42 intraoperatively prior to skin grafting.
Patient’s left thigh post biodegradable temporising matrix delamination and fenestrated split thickness skin grafts intraoperatively.
Patient’s left thigh post split thickness skin graft review day 7 showing more than 80% take.
Patient’s left thigh 5 months postoperatively showing a maturing scar, with a small eschar of the proximal medial portion. The right donor thigh shows a maturing scar post split thickness skin graft.
Outcome and follow-up
At 5 months, he had a soft, mature pliable scar on the left thigh with return to baseline mobilisation. His donor site wound has fully healed (figure 7). The two regions that were left to heal by secondary intention continue to be dressed with Inadine two times per week with good progression.
Discussion
Large infected areas of exposed muscle pose multiple reconstructive challenges.8 Treatment involves adequate debridement of infected tissue and application of VAC dressing to regenerate the wound bed.8 However, to regenerate a graftable wound bed with negative pressure therapy alone can take a prolonged period of time with a risk of graft failure.8 The rationale for using BTM was based on national and international case report studies with similar clinical scenarios showing the qualities of BTM and its ability to generate a robust tissue layer for STSG take.10 Sreedharan et al demonstrated the successful application of BTM to lower limb large tissue defects with exposed muscle and tendons after surgery for necrotising fasciitis.8 They showed how BTM offers a thicker, mobile and durable skin reconstruction compared with STSGs alone.8 Wagstaff et al showed that BTM can be used to cover the deep structures of the neck in a woman in her 50s who underwent radical debridement of the anterior cervical region due to necrotising fasciitis.7 They also showed less skin contracture in the neck compared with their experience of STSGs alone.7
This is the first case to use BTM in a previously irradiated patient who went on to develop necrotising fasciitis and secondary lymphoedema. The BTM integrated within 4 weeks. This was determined during his weekly clinic visits by assessing the colour and capillary refill time in the material.3 Given the fact that BTM can be left for up to 8 weeks,3 we decided to skin graft at 5 weeks. Following delamination intraoperatively, the neodermis filled in most of the defect with a thick robust layer improving any concavity caused by the initial debridement.3 10 The skin grafts took well and matured quickly, allowing for early scar management and physiotherapy.3
When we encountered the complication of lower limb cellulitis remote from the BTM material, the patient was admitted and treated with intravenous antibiotics. Unlike other dermal matrices, had the BTM become infected, most reports suggest it would not have caused automatic failure of the material.3 BTM is salvageable with antibiotic coverage and topical wound care.3
At 5 months, there was very little contracture of the wound with good functional and aesthetic outcome.3 10 However, due to the short length of follow-up, it is difficult to comment on potential secondary contracture in the future.3 The total cost of the BTM sheets used for this patient was €5170. It is important to mention that BTM is approximately one-third the cost of biological matrices and has shown more favourable results in comparison to other options. We found BTM to be a versatile reconstructive option that can be applied successfully to a wide range of complex defects in almost any region of the body.3
Patient’s perspective
When I was initially diagnosed with necrotising fasciitis of my left thigh, I was rushed to my local emergency department for further investigations and surgery. I consider myself extremely fortunate that I was under the care of a team who were able to act incredibly fast to save my leg. Following my surgery I was under the care of a multi-disciplinary team that kept me well informed about my diagnosis, treatment and recovery.
The care I received after my leg was debrided was exemplary. This includes everyone from the cleaning staff to healthcare professionals and nurses. The hospital staff, including the consultant, rang my wife weekly, if not daily to keep her fully up-to-date with my recovery. This meant a lot to me as I had limited family visits due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Six weeks post-debridement, I was referred to a plastic surgery unit for further surgery to cover the defect on my thigh. My admission to the tertiary referral hospital was very smooth and quick. I was transferred by ambulance that took approximately 2-hours in duration, and as I arrived the hospital staff were very professional and caring. There was one particular senior surgeon who I found to be excellent, not only when she was introducing me to this novel BTM material, but throughout my treatment. Having someone like that throughout this journey was reassuring.
From having had three serious operations on the same leg over the past 16-years, I feel I had a certain mental resilience build-up that helped me in my postoperative recovery period. Invariably there were days where I felt ‘down’, but the tremendous support I received from both my wife and children gave me the strength to push through.
Overall, I feel I dealt with the debridements and BTM operations very well. When I woke up from each operation, I felt well in myself and was informed on what to expect in the coming days. What I was not prepared for and what proved the most frustrating from a mindset point of view, was the recovery from the skin grafting operation, particularly on the donor site. While I expected some level of pain, the pain experienced was very severe and the recovery time very slow. I say frustrating because I am a very active individual who enjoys exercising and had to stop until I was fully recovered. The consultant plastic surgeon explained that prior radiotherapy exposure to the thigh will almost always interfere with the healing process, slowing it down. The on-going lymphoedema is still not fully settled preventing me from wearing my foot brace and walking without crutches.
I continue to visit the plastic surgery clinic every 2-weeks for progression. There are areas in my thigh that weren't covered with a skin graft and left to heal by secondary intention. Those areas are still being monitored and dressed. I was advised at some point to remove all dressings and leave them exposed to the air to allow them to dry. I appreciate my clinic appointments as they are never rushed and all my questions and concerns are answered promptly. From a work perspective, my employer has been very supportive and there is no pressure to return to work until I am ready.
Learning points
-
The biodegradable temporising matrix (BTM) integrated into the thigh and enhanced the split thickness skin graft (STSG) take with favourable scarring.
-
We observed minimal wound contraction compared with the use of STSGs alone.
-
The two-stage procedure was relatively straightforward to follow with minimal complications.
-
Even though the BTM can be left on the wound for up to 8 weeks, the patient was ready for the application of STSGs at 5 weeks.
-
Unlike other dermal matrices, Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonisation of the wound bed did not lead to failure of the BTM.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Contributors DA took pictures, assisted in surgery and wrote the manuscript. JK and MCC performed the surgery, initiated and supervised the project. All authors revised the manuscript and followed up the patient.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer